My Newest Supra Theory: RC to the Rescue - Page 2 - Supra FT1 Forum
 1Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #11 of 17 Old 05-28-2014, 01:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
But the $50k-$60k price is just the starting price. Most people aren't going to get a bare bones Supra, so by the time you've added things and such, the price is going to get up quite a bit higher than that. What are we looking at for a top of the line Supra?



Mr.Big is offline  
post #12 of 17 Old 05-30-2014, 04:21 PM
MKV
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 866
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vh_supra26 View Post
I don't think it will have much to do with being a "new SC". The LF-LC is reported to be built on the LS platform. It is a luxury cope. It looks like it will compete with cars like the Mercedes CL (S-Class coupe) and rumored BMW 8-Series.

On the other hand the BMW/Toyota midsize roadster could be a be a new SC or SC replacement.



Interesting, I always though the SC was in that class of higher luxury, more along the lines of a cruiser, I guess maybe not.
MKV is offline  
post #13 of 17 Old 06-02-2014, 12:16 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Big View Post
But the $50k-$60k price is just the starting price. Most people aren't going to get a bare bones Supra, so by the time you've added things and such, the price is going to get up quite a bit higher than that. What are we looking at for a top of the line Supra?
If a base model starts at $50k maybe it will top out at $60k?

And if the high performance model starts at $60k than maybe a $70k price tage after all the goodies are added on?
vh_supra26 is offline  
 
post #14 of 17 Old 06-02-2014, 12:19 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKV View Post
Interesting, I always though the SC was in that class of higher luxury, more along the lines of a cruiser, I guess maybe not.
I think the first gen SC300/400 was more of a S-Class coupe/CL fighter.

But the second gen SC430 was aimed more at the Mercedes SL, BMW 6-Series, and Cadillac XLR.
vh_supra26 is offline  
post #15 of 17 Old 06-02-2014, 03:07 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Josef K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
I'd LOVE to see Toyota sell the Supra with baked in options. I'm not talking about nonsense, but make the only option sunroof or no sunroof, gearbox, cloth or leather and of course colours. They could restrict certain looks to the trim levels. But make it about the car, NOT about the options and standard features like 1400 airbags, ball massager and cupholders of course



Josef K is offline  
post #16 of 17 Old 03-26-2018, 10:21 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Optional Options

Josef,
While that would indeed be nice, it won’t happen. The options and packages is where the profit comes from (at least speaking from the perspective of a BMW owner). I could get a $27,000 Kia or Toyota with safety features standard (LDW, Driver Assist, Rear Camera, etc), but BMW still lists these things as options on most of its sub-$100,000 vehicles!!

On another note, with regard to BMW engine quality, stated HP and torque:
1. BMW builds some of the best engines in the world, and other manufacturers often lag behind BMW in new engine development so they can tear apart their engines and try to develop duplicates. BMW is famous for understating the HP and torque that their engines generate. Additionally, with the new Supra purportedly weighing ~2850 lbs, it can reach 60 mph in ~3.8 seconds, which is about the speed of the last generation M5 with its twin-Turbo V-8 generating over 560 HP. Back to my point: BMW builds some of the finest production car engines in the world, and they’ve been the absolute leader in the six-cylinder configuration. I owned a Supra (1986.5 model) with 24 valves that HP, and loved it for the 10 yrs I owned it, starting from the first day I bought new from the dealer. While it was over-weight, I thoroughly enjoyed it. But when it comes to power plants (engines, transmissions), the Europeans are years ahead of the Asian car makers.
Dann-0h is offline  
post #17 of 17 Old 05-03-2019, 06:40 AM
Junior Member
 
Mirella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yea I don't read anything that is that controversial in this. The dimensions are so similar that I would be surprised if the two were not riding on the same platform. And when you consider that it makes sense from a cost minimization standpoint, it seems near certainty.

This is a
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

 a real cool resource
Mirella is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Supra FT1 Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off